You may choose the preferred parts from each category below. There are many choices, so you can create a daughter that nobody else has. This is the beginning of a new doll renaissance.
Time magazine recently featured a sidebar on the phenom of Super Dollfies, eery Japanese dolls that look like inappropriately sexy schoolgirls dressed in latex nurse outfits and such. Turns out the people at Time were partly confusing Dollfies and anime figurines, so the Dollfies are slightly less obscene than that, but not by much. Considering you can buy your Dollfies thigh-high white vinyl leggings and an array of undergarments, it's still pretty disturbing.
Huh. I wanted to make a comment about how this is really weird and disturbing, but in the end it's no weirder than Barbie dolls or any other kind of collectible doll.
(I remember seeing a franklin-mint style circular a few years back for these two dolls, boy and girl, that had been "naughty" and were designed to be displayed standing with their face in the corner. That seriously weirded me out.)
Posted by: spacewaitress | July 24, 2004 at 07:10 PM
Oh, those near-life-sized naughty kid dolls? I used to walk by one of those in the skyway, and it's ten times creepier up close. Totally Blair Witch.
But these Japanese dolls, yes... uhh, just sick I tell you. Of course I wont' be able to say just how sick until my shipment arrives and I can closely inspect them.
Posted by: Chuck | July 26, 2004 at 04:16 PM
"Mimi becomes such beautiful, and it appears from SD13. It dances from a different dimension momentarily by approaching to the adult and the pretty appearance to get off is confirmed."
That was a description of a doll from the Volk's Super Dollfie site. I think it says it all.
Posted by: Lorika | July 27, 2004 at 01:06 PM
http://www.volks.co.jp/en/superdollfie/mini_sd/misia/index_misia.aspx
ack!
Posted by: Lorika | July 27, 2004 at 01:07 PM
Ack is right! These are the kind of things that wait until the lights are out and then prey upon animals and small children. Good Christ! What is wrong with people?!
Posted by: Tim | July 27, 2004 at 05:12 PM
Albino vampire pixie attack! Argh!!!
"This doll exists to make you happy. It has a grown-up look with sophisticated expression. This thireen-year-old visitor has a mysterious existence with a grown-up's charm, yet an innocent expression. The doll is waiting for your embrace!"
I think my favorite SD is "Michael - Young Nobleman of Darkness". Please note the lacy thigh-high stockings. On Michael. The young nobleman of darkness.
"Coating the whole body to the moisturising and frosting touch."
Posted by: Mr. Pants | July 27, 2004 at 07:12 PM
Wow, how sad is that you people have nothing better to do than make fun of a hobby you clearly know nothing about?
Posted by: Connie | October 27, 2004 at 04:32 PM
Interesting that you provided a link to my blog category on SDs. What is disturbing? Part of the problem with people who are unfamiliar with a doll hobby , particularily one that is japanese influenced, they do not understand the japanese "gothic lolita" fashion that some of the SDs were dressed in. Another part is that the japanese that aren't fluent in english do have a funny way of combining english words to describe what they want to conveny, such as "moisturising and frosting touch". As the first person that commented said, this doll hobby is no different than those that collect Barbies.
Posted by: nikita | October 27, 2004 at 04:47 PM
Hi, Connie. This is a blog primarily about pop culture. Sometimes we are entertained by things that seem a little odd. I had a nice little discussion with nikita at www.jellykiss.com and she didn't seem to think my interest was sad or mean. We're just curious observers with a good sense of humor. I'm sorry that you took offense. Perhaps next time you'll make an effort to inform us rather than merely belittling us.
Posted by: Jonathan | October 27, 2004 at 05:09 PM
Whoops- there's nikita. I don't see any problem with my commenting on this blog that I think these dolls are creepy. I think most dolls are creepy (e.g. Barbies). That is my opinion, and I have no desire to prevent or belittle others who have an interest in collecting dolls. This is not an attack, and I'm not sure why this entry is causing so much interest all of a sudden.
Here's what transpired in the comments section of your blog several months ago, where I thought we were cool about this (I'm "Mr. Pants"):
I hope you don't mind that I linked to your blog on a little blurb I did about SDs. I'm pretty creeped out by the whole thing, but I thought it would be good to show that not just aging child molesters are into these things. Um, since I'm assuming you're not an aging child molester. ;)
Posted by Mr. Pants at July 24, 2004 03:15
PM LOL! Nope, definitely not an aging child molester here! The SDs are creepy at first, but once you see them in person, the creepiness wears off. They are quite beautiful in sculpt and posability.
Posted by nikita at July 24, 2004 03:24 PM
Posted by: Jonathan | October 27, 2004 at 05:30 PM
I still think they're creepy. And I still want one.
Posted by: Chuck | October 27, 2004 at 05:39 PM
Hi, Jonathan. When people refer to something as obscene and creepy, I guess it sorta leaves the "ha ha, look at our funny sense of humor" category. Besides, you don't exactly seem like you're dying to learn more.
Posted by: Connie | October 27, 2004 at 06:31 PM
So then what's the big deal? We were amused and you're not. How is that "sad"? I'm currently reading a mass-market sci-fi paperback based on a film series and you're more than welcome to make fun of me for it, but please don't take away my right to have an opinion. I saw an article (however innacurate) in Time magazine, I was intrigued (and disturbed) and blogged about it on my website about pop culture. I looked into the website of a fan of said hobby and showed a casual but genuine interest. Still, I thought it was weird, but interesting, and then I moved on to...let's see, oh: more of my geeky sci-fi interests ("Revenge of the CGI Programmers"), which I also applied my sense of humor to. I'd call myself an "equal opportunity offender" but I hardly find any of this offensive. You don't have to look too far to find some much nastier junk out there.
Also, to clarify: I find the images and the dolls themselves creepy. At no point did I say anything negative about the people who buy or collect the dolls. As for the "obscene" quote, well...I stand by my opinion that buying lingerie to dress up tiny artificial human beings is a little freaky. And I stand by Chuck's right to desire to do so. See? It's all about love.
Posted by: Jonathan | October 27, 2004 at 07:00 PM
I love you, man.
Posted by: Daisy | October 27, 2004 at 07:04 PM
And your little doll, too.
Posted by: Daisy | October 27, 2004 at 10:25 PM
Ah-ha! This explains the recent comments. Sorry, gang!
"Why can't I buy a doll with nipples when someone can go buy a REAL child a pair of sweatpants with "Juicy" or "Cutie" written across the rump?
You sir, are the sick one."
WHAT??? I do not own, nor will I ever own, nor will I ever purchase for anyone, be they friend or enemy, sweatpants with ANYTHING written across the rump. What did I do to deserve these accusations?
"Good thing he linked to the Dollfie Dreams undies category ... I just found an underwear set that I want to get for my doll ... And yes, my doll IS sexy, and I'm proud of her! Saori says: "BITE ME!" (But not too hard, she's made of vinyl)"
I will not bite your doll...unless the act would be accepted as some kind of peace offering to the SD community. I only wish peace, harmony, flowers, and fluffy bunnies upon all of you.
Meanwhile, our two major presidential candidates STILL have not spoken out on the pressing issue of Super Dollfies. I will remain undecided until their opinions are known. You're running out of time, guys!
(If any of the authors of the above links are truly offended I will gladly de-link you. Meanwhile, thanks for all the traffic!)
Posted by: Jonathan | October 27, 2004 at 10:34 PM
I must say that Jonathan DID make the effort to post links to the Volks website AND the SD FAQ. I wasn't offended by what Jonathan posted,...more like some of the comments that were written to his post.
Posted by: nikita | October 27, 2004 at 11:08 PM
I guess I should clarify then-- I didn't find your blog offensive. I found some of the comments made offensive.. and I never accused you of buying sweatpants with something written across the butt. Lo siento Señor.
Posted by: Connie | October 27, 2004 at 11:58 PM
You know what creeps me out more than anything? How polite this little feud is. I have to go puke now. And I'm going to puke on my personal collection of broken doll parts and children's lingerie. Because this is America, dammit.
Posted by: Bride of Chuckie | October 28, 2004 at 02:15 AM
Blast! Ok, Children's lingerie. Now my timing is ruined.
Posted by: Bride of Chuckie | October 28, 2004 at 02:21 AM
Sir, I hasten to pee upon you.
(how's that?)
Posted by: Jonathan | October 28, 2004 at 08:08 AM
I'm 37, work full time, am married with a 3 year old daughter, and I like dolls. I own several including some Super Dollfies. Here's a photo of one wearing a dress I made.
http://www.biscuitshouse.com/bjd/meringue5.jpg
I enjoy making doll clothes, making dolls, and taking photos of them.
Am I weird? Is my hobby sick and disturbing? To me it isn't, but people are entitled to their opinion. I enjoy it and I'm not hurting anyone. I think it's not any weirder than people who collect wrapped sugar cubes or camembert labels.
Posted by: Helene | October 28, 2004 at 09:32 AM
I think it's not any weirder than people who collect wrapped sugar cubes or camembert labels.
Do people actually collect those things? Because that is REALLY weird. Oh, good lord, they do.
I suggest that all readers of this thread watch the "America's Most Suspicious" sketch from episode 10 of the Ben Stiller Show (available at your finer DVD retailers nationwide). Pour yourself a cup of your favorite beverage. Have a good laugh. Sleep. Awake the next day refreshed and ready to concentrate on the impending election.
Posted by: Jonathan | October 28, 2004 at 10:31 AM
Oh for fooks sake. I'm going to hold my tongue, then hold it again, and then clamp it and possibly sew my mouth shut. Then I will make a precious doll, an effigy of me, his little mouth sewn shut, and together we'll make it through this without saying a word.
I do like those camembert labels, though.
Posted by: Chuck | October 28, 2004 at 02:12 PM
At least I know what to get Chuck for Christmas now.
Posted by: Jonathan | October 28, 2004 at 02:34 PM